What is the difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0?

Web 2.0 is a buzzword commonly used to encompass a variety of new procedures and the World Wide Web. Despite the fact that most of the economic cycle, some of the key attributes colligated Web 2.0 includes the emergence of social networks, two-way communication, different & # 39; Adhesive & # 39; multifariousness techniques and major content types. Although most Web 2.0 is running on the same platform as 1.0, there are some important differences. Our goal is to lead out the key features of the elementary characterized by differences in interest 2.0.

enamours combination of Web 2.0 concepts on the Web in recent years. The exact definition delicate and difficult to categorize the binary label "Web 1.0" and "Web 2.0". But there is a crowded separation of a series of extremely popular Web 2.0 sites such as Facebook and YouTube, and the old Web. These separation seeable when fabricated onto the various axes, such as the technological and structural sociological.

One key difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 that the creators are very few Web 1.0 most of mere users will only benefit consumers, content, and any user can content generator Web 2.0 and the various technological segélyökkel expanded potential increase content generation.

Another difference between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 can be based on time. The term "Web 2.0," coined around 2004, and many of the first true Web 2.0 began moving in late 2003 and early 2004, the websites that have been modified a bit structures since the early 2000 & # 39; Before you can be counted on Web 1.0 (for example, IMDB).

The most important feature of Web 2.0 is that these sites increase the users to expend as much as possible on their site. They offer strong incentives increasing stickiness on the site. The majority of the Web 1.0 site links to external sites, users can easily follow those links to other sites. The primary reason is that most Web 1.0 sites tends to cover a topic and do not require users to log in to access them. On the other hand, Web 2.0 sites encourage intra-site activities, usually requiring users to log in and build links with the rest of the site.

Web 1.0 sites were one-way communication while Web 2.0 to build two-way communication medium. Web 1.0 was autocratic and top-down. On the other hand, Web 2.0 and democracy from the bottom up. Instead of the New York Times website about 1.0, what is important stories of the day was Digg.com, Buzz and Yahoo.com depicts the story of the users voted the most important.

Web 1.0 sites must be read passively openly. Web 2.0 tempt to participate, to vote content up or down grading it, noting it and submit new posts. In 2000, Amazon.com, which allows users to review the books, but now users can participate in a variety of ways, such as product lists, create, write product reviews, and edit wiki articles (Amapedia). In 2000, Amazon was utilizing sites to sell products they purchased. With Web 2.0, Amazon now allows you to list and sell through their own old and new books and products on the website.

Web 1.0 pages were static and rarely get changed, where the dynamic Web 2.0 sites and change every hour or more frequently, pondering all of these users share. Web 1.0 sites have been closed sites Web 2.0 sites collaborative sites.

The following table highlights the distinguishing features between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0, and compares that things have changed since the web culture overturned.

Web 1.0 [1945901million]

This was about reading

This was the company

This is a client-server

This is the HTML

This is the website

This was the portals

had some taxonomy

This was the wires

This was the property of

This was the IPO & # 39; s

This was the Netscape

This is a screen scraping

This was the Web Forms

This was the hardware costs

It was a dial-up

This was a top-down

edited and produced

It was a banner ads

Web 2.0 [1945901million]

This writing

This is about communities

This is about peer-to-peer

This is the XML

This blogs

This is about RSS

This is about member

This wireless

This is about sharing

This is about the commercialization

This is about Google

This is about API

This web applications

This is about bandwidth costs

This broadband

This bottom -Up

This crude

This AdSense

Source by Adam Ada

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *