Web 2.0 is a buzzword commonly used to encompass a variety of new procedures and the World Wide Web. Despite the fact that most of the economic cycle, some of the key attributes colligated Web 2.0 includes the emergence of social networks, two-way communication, different & # 39; Adhesive & # 39; multifariousness techniques and major content types. Although most Web 2.0 is running on the same platform as 1.0, there are some important differences. Our goal is to lead out the key features of the elementary characterized by differences in interest 2.0.
enamours combination of Web 2.0 concepts on the Web in recent years. The exact definition delicate and difficult to categorize the binary label "Web 1.0" and "Web 2.0". But there is a crowded separation of a series of extremely popular Web 2.0 sites such as Facebook and YouTube, and the old Web. These separation seeable when fabricated onto the various axes, such as the technological and structural sociological.
One key difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 that the creators are very few Web 1.0 most of mere users will only benefit consumers, content, and any user can content generator Web 2.0 and the various technological segélyökkel expanded potential increase content generation.
Another difference between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 can be based on time. The term "Web 2.0," coined around 2004, and many of the first true Web 2.0 began moving in late 2003 and early 2004, the websites that have been modified a bit structures since the early 2000 & # 39; Before you can be counted on Web 1.0 (for example, IMDB).
The most important feature of Web 2.0 is that these sites increase the users to expend as much as possible on their site. They offer strong incentives increasing stickiness on the site. The majority of the Web 1.0 site links to external sites, users can easily follow those links to other sites. The primary reason is that most Web 1.0 sites tends to cover a topic and do not require users to log in to access them. On the other hand, Web 2.0 sites encourage intra-site activities, usually requiring users to log in and build links with the rest of the site.
Web 1.0 sites were one-way communication while Web 2.0 to build two-way communication medium. Web 1.0 was autocratic and top-down. On the other hand, Web 2.0 and democracy from the bottom up. Instead of the New York Times website about 1.0, what is important stories of the day was Digg.com, Buzz and Yahoo.com depicts the story of the users voted the most important.
Web 1.0 sites must be read passively openly. Web 2.0 tempt to participate, to vote content up or down grading it, noting it and submit new posts. In 2000, Amazon.com, which allows users to review the books, but now users can participate in a variety of ways, such as product lists, create, write product reviews, and edit wiki articles (Amapedia). In 2000, Amazon was utilizing sites to sell products they purchased. With Web 2.0, Amazon now allows you to list and sell through their own old and new books and products on the website.
Web 1.0 pages were static and rarely get changed, where the dynamic Web 2.0 sites and change every hour or more frequently, pondering all of these users share. Web 1.0 sites have been closed sites Web 2.0 sites collaborative sites.
The following table highlights the distinguishing features between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0, and compares that things have changed since the web culture overturned.
Web 1.0 [1945901million]
This was about reading
This was the company
This is a client-server
This is the HTML
This is the website
This was the portals
had some taxonomy
This was the wires
This was the property of
This was the IPO & # 39; s
This was the Netscape
This is a screen scraping
This was the Web Forms
This was the hardware costs
It was a dial-up
This was a top-down
edited and produced
It was a banner ads
Web 2.0 [1945901million]
This writing
This is about communities
This is about peer-to-peer
This is the XML
This blogs
This is about RSS
This is about member
This wireless
This is about sharing
This is about the commercialization
This is about Google
This is about API
This web applications
This is about bandwidth costs
This broadband
This bottom -Up
This crude
This AdSense